GlobalWarming & ClimateChange News Desk – Most fossil fuel companies have produced more emissions in the seven years since the Paris Agreement was signed than the seven years before the major climate pact, a new report reveals.
@acenewsservices
Ace Press News From Cutting Room Floor: Published: Apr.08: 2024: Friday 5 Apr 2024 at 5:50AM: TELEGRAM Ace Daily News Link https://t.me/+PuI36tlDsM7GpOJe
It found that 80 per cent of the fossil fuel and cement emissions since the Paris Agreement have come from just 57 producers.
State-owned oil producer Saudi Aramco has produced the most carbon emissions since the Paris Agreement, making up 4.8 per cent of global emissions. The aim of the Paris Agreement forged in 2015 is for all countries to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions to keep global warming to at least 1.5 degrees.
The report is released by UK not-for-profit think tank InfluenceMap, which focuses on climate risks and is known for its work tracking the lobbying of fossil fuel emitters.
This latest analysis is based on emissions data collected in a database called Carbon Majors that has been running since 2013. It attributes emissions to the top 122 coal, oil, gas and cement producers and ranks them for their overall contribution to climate change. These entities account for three-quarters of global emissions. InfluenceMap’s program manager Daan Van Acker said the aim was to bring more transparency to the sources of the bulk of global emissions. “ The main objective of the database is really to be an accountability tool, holding these entities to account for the products that they’ve produced, which are the foremost contributor to global climate change,” he said.
“ It’s a very limited group of companies that are such a significant portion of global emissions.”
Four Australian companies are included in the database: BHP, Woodside, Santos and Whitehaven Coal. Three of them increased emissions since 2016, according to the research, however it noted that BHP had a “significant” decrease in emissions.
Holding big polluters to account
The report traces emissions as far back as the Industrial Revolution, when humans began burning fossil fuels and emitting increasing amounts of carbon into the atmosphere. Overall, China’s national coal production has been the biggest single source of pollution, accounting for 14 per cent of global historical emissions, with the former Soviet Union coming in second. Mr Van Acker said the research had been applied in many ways to hold companies to account, including climate litigation. “ We’re seeing the data being used in legal cases, holding these fossil fuel producers to account for climate damages,” he said.
The database was cited in a recent case in which a Belgian farmer was arguing that an oil and gas company was partly responsible for damage to his farm from extreme weather.
@acenewsservices
“We anticipate that that will only continue to happen more as we go forward,” Mr Van Acker said. “ We’re also seeing [the data] in academic research, quantifying the contribution that the emissions by these producers have made to, for example, sea level rise to forest fire risk, and so on.
“ But also it can be used by investors in the companies or by campaign groups looking to pressure these companies.”
@acenewsservices
The Paris Agreement also marked a change in coal emissions; while investor-owned coal companies have reduced their output since 2015, coal emissions from state-owned companies have increased. “ It’s certainly an interesting issue to analyse further, what’s causing that, whether it’s investor pressure that has managed to somewhat drive down the production of coal among investor-owned companies,” Mr Van Acker told the ABC. The top shareholder-owned companies responsible for historical emissions are Chevon, ExxonMobil, BP, Shell, and ConocoPhillips and they have contributed 11 per cent of historical emissions.
“We believe the future of energy is lower carbon […] and we aspire to reach net zero upstream emissions [Scope 1 and 2] by 2050,” a spokesman said.
BHP said in a statement that the company was on track to deliver its target to curb operational emissions by 30 per cent by 2030, with an “aspirational goal” to reach net zero emissions in 2050.
Shell Australia declined to comment, saying it could not verify the data and would only comment on their own emissions.
The ABC has also contacted Santos, Woodside, Whitehaven Coal, and ExxonMobil for comment.
To compile their database, the researchers use company data on their production of fossil fuels to calculate emissions, as well as industry and government data when needed.
In an initial response, Chevron Australia pointed to its latest climate report, saying the company supported the global ambitions of the Paris Agreement.
1p@acenewsservices
At Sterling Publishing & Media Service Agency, we value transparency and accountability. We want to inform you that we are not responsible for any external content, links, or posts. Nonetheless, we are dedicated to providing exceptional services and sincerely appreciate your support. Thank you.
@acenewsservices
