Ace Daily News

(AUSTRALIA) TELSTRA REPORT: Government and telecoms giant Telstra are buying a Pacific telecoms company in a joint venture to block China #AceNewsDesk report

#AceNewsReport – Oct.26: Digicel Pacific employs 1,700 people across Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Samoa, Vanuatu and Tahiti: The company’s future has been the focus of speculation for months: According to Telstra, the Australian government approached it “to provide technical advice in relation to Digicel Pacific” which is “critical to telecommunications in the region”: The government then agreed to finance the bulk of the bid, Telstra said.

#AceDailyNews according to BBC Australia Report: Digicel Pacific: Australia’s Telstra called the A$2.1bn ($1.6bn; £1.2bn) deal a “unique and very attractive commercial opportunity to boost our presence in the region”.Last year Digicel denied a report that it was in talks to sell its Pacific arm to state-owned China Mobile. this move is being viewed as a political block to China’s influence in the region.

Telstra logo
Telstra is Australia’s largest telecoms company

Telstra to buy Pacific arm of telecommunications giant Digicel with Canberra’s support amid China’s rising influence according to ABC News

A man walks past a Telstra shop in Darwin, he looks down at his phone.
The Telstra acquisition ensures Digicel Pacific stays out of China’s hands. (ABC News: Michael Franchi)

Telstra and the Australian government have finalised a deal to buy and operate the largest telecommunications company in the Pacific, in a move largely seen as an effort to counter China’s influence in the region.

The $2.1 billion deal to acquire and run Digicel Pacific is being funded largely by the government, which will provide $1.9 billion toward the acquisition.

Telstra said it would contribute $360 million and own 100 per cent of the company’s ordinary equity.

The deal, which is expected to be completed within the next six months, is “consistent with Australia’s longstanding commitment to growing quality investment in regional infrastructure,” the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade said in a statement.

“Telstra’s acquisition sends an important signal about the company’s potential and about wider business confidence in the future of the Pacific region.”

Digicel, founded by Irish billionaire Denis O’Brien, is the largest mobile phone carrier in the Pacific with operations in Papua New Guinea, Fiji, Samoa, Vanuatu, Tonga and Nauru.

The company makes more than $300 million a year in profit.

Telstra chief executive Andy Penn said that there would be no sweeping changes to the way Digicel operated in the Pacific.

A close-up of a man with grey hair as he speaks
Andy Penn says Australia has a keen interest in investing in the Pacific.(AAP: James Ross)

“We are not looking to change the business model in any material way,” he told the ABC.

“Obviously, as time goes by plans change in design and people will want more data. We’ll be looking at providing expertise and advice on how to do that.

“But no plans to change the brand, no plans to change the business model, no plans to change the team in any material way.” 

He suggested that Telstra would focus on boosting mobile and internet infrastructure in the Pacific.

Telstra edges out China Mobile

The talks followed reports that China Mobile, the biggest telecoms operator in China, had shown interest in buying the Pacific arm of telecommunications giant: The deal comes after several months of discussions between Telstra and the government over the strategic asset.

Mr Penn also would not be drawn on whether the federal government offered a substantial package to Telstra because it wanted to make sure the company was not snapped up by a Chinese state-owned enterprise, saying that “wasn’t a matter” for the company.

“Clearly Australia has a keen interest in the Pacific region and provides finance … to large businesses like Telstra interested in investing in the region, and really that’s the origins of this transaction,” he said.

Trade Minister Dan Tehan also brushed off questions about China, saying the government was intent on encouraging better infrastructure in the region.

“The thing that was in the forefront of the government’s mind is that we continue to see quality investment in the Pacific. That’s what drove the government’s decision making,” he said.

Telstra said it was initially approached by the Australian government to provide technical advice in relation to Digicel Pacific and subsequently considered acquiring the business with its financial and strategic risk management support.

Stopping Digicel Pacific from ending up in the hands of a Chinese company has been seen almost as strategically important as stopping Huawei from getting a hold in Australia’s 5G network.

Play Video. Duration: 4 minutes 59 seconds
Breaking down the federal government’s decision to buy Digicel Pacific

“Australian officials were concerned about whether a Chinese company or potentially a Chinese state-owned entity might look to buy Digicel’s Pacific arm and there were some geopolitical and geostrategic concerns about a Chinese company owning a major telecommunication company in the Pacific region, which is of course so close to Australia,” said Amanda Watson, an expert in Pacific communications at the Australian National University.

That’s especially since Digicel Pacific uses a 4,700km undersea cable from Sydney that was largely funded by the Australian government in 2018 in an effort to prevent PNG and the Solomon Islands from contracting Huawei for the project.

Concerns over potential reputational damage

Martin Waieng, a medical student in PNG’s capital of Port Moresby, said he felt locals would be supportive of Australia’s investment in the region, saying there was trust in the Telstra brand.

“I’m quite relieved that it’s Telstra taking over and not a Chinese company taking over,” he said.

Dr Watson said retaining local employees would be crucial to a successful takeover of the company.

“There would be people who are very familiar with the operating environment in their particular small Pacific island nation or their particular province or region of Papua New Guinea.”

Nevertheless, there remained some risk of reputational damage for Australia, she said.

“Depending on what happens with services and pricing and so on, it could be damaging for Australia’s reputation and relationship with the Pacific or it might be positive.

“If, for instance, there is a situation where a cyclone takes out the telecommunication network in a large area of a Pacific island and it takes days or weeks for that to be repaired … I certainly think there’s some risk for the Australian government and its diplomatic relationships with the Pacific, as well as for the Telstra company itself.”

Strategic move

Analysts say the company would otherwise be attractive to China as it seeks to assert greater authority in the region.

“Digicel is the primary player in the Pacific and Australia sees it as a strategic asset that they can’t allow to fall into the hands of China,” said Jonathan Pryke of the Lowy Institute, a Sydney-based think tank.

“They are keen to get Australian business back into the Pacific and they’ve come to the realisation that they are going to have to underwrite.”

A spokesman for Australia’s Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade told newswire Reuters: “Partnering on infrastructure development is a key part of our Pacific step-up.”Australia and China are big trading partners but have disagreed on a number of important political issues

Amid escalating tensions with China, Australia has ramped up its presence in the Pacific. 

This includes allocating $1.5bn to investment in infrastructure projects in the region as well as joining the Quad group, with the US, India and Japan, and the Aukus security pact, with the US and UK.

It also largely funded a 4,700km (2,900-mile) Coral Sea cable in 2018 to prevent Chinese telecoms company Huawei Technologies from laying it.

It is also now helping to finance an undersea optic fibre cable for Palau. 

Chinese control of telecommunications networks has long been a concern for Washington and its allies. 

This has led many countries to ban Huawei and other Chinese companies from supplying phone lines and 5G networks, including the US, UK and Australia.

#AceNewsDesk report ………….Published: Oct.26: 2021:

Editor says …Sterling Publishing & Media Service Agency is not responsible for the content of external site or from any reports, posts or links, and can also be found here on Telegram: all of our posts fromTwitter can be found here: and all wordpress and live posts and links here: thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet and free help and guidance tips on your PC software or need help & guidance from our experts AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com

Ace Daily News

(AUSTRALIA) ACCC REPORT: Accusses Telstra, Optus and TPG of misleading customers on NBN speeds, takes them to court #AceNewsDesk report

#AceNewsReport – Aug.25: About 400,000 residential broadband customers moved to higher speed plans in the June 2021 quarter as the recent trend of Australian consumers upgrading to faster NBN connections continued, the ACCC’s latest NBN Wholesale Market Indicators Report reveals…

#AceDailyNews says but people trying to use NBN through his provider, TPG, realised it couldn’t give fast enough speeds to deliver whats needed …..ABC has developed an internet connection widget which shows how your connection compares to other options in terms of speed, reliability and cost.

Working from home during lockdown means Mohammad Makki needs reliable internet: It was frustrating because I could not communicate,” he said.

“I had to apologise every day to students for a week or two that, ‘Sorry, this is happening. Sorry, there is a problem with the internet.'”

Mr Makki was angry that telecommunications retailers advertise high speeds that they can’t deliver.

He moved house to Figtree NSW earlier this year and had wanted to carry over his fixed-line service with retail provider TPG.

The retailer was advertising speeds of 100Mbps for an NBN plan. But Mr Makki was dubious about the speed being delivered.

“I ran a couple of speed tests [online] over a couple of days. And it [the result] was consistent – it was only 8 Mbps and it was not good.”

Mr Makki spent much time speaking to his provider and eventually had NBN workers visit his premises to confirm the same — the speed was slower that what he was promised.

ACCC report
The ACCC has been measuring NBN speeds offered by retailers and they have not stacked up.

NBN Co said before connection it would “estimate the line speed that should be attainable at that property”.

“And once each property is connected to the NBN network, NBN Co updates internet retailers on the actual performance observed.”

As Mr Makki discovered, the problem with many fixed-line connections under the fibre-to-the-node model is that if a customer’s home is too far away from the node it can impact the speed and connection quality, which also can be affected by the condition of the copper wire going to the home.

Mr Makki has chosen to leave his provider, and instead opt for a wireless connection that relies on a 4G mobile signal.

But there are hundreds of thousands of Australians who have slow internet after signing up for fixed-line NBN connections.

This is why Australia’s consumer watchdog, the ACCC, is taking Telstra, Optus and TPG to court, alleging they misled hundreds of thousands of consumers over NBN speeds.

If it succeeds, the companies could each be forced to pay millions of dollars in fines.

Who checks NBN speeds?

Despite the $60 billion investment in NBN Co, Australia lags far behind the world’s best in broadband speeds, ranking at number 53 on the Speedtest Global Index.Now the NBN rollout is complete, what comes next?

Government declared the rollout was complete late last year. But some Australians remain unhappy and confused about what happens next.

While speeds being provided to customers are improving, complaints about slow speeds and lack of connectivity ran high at the start of the pandemic

The Telecommunications Industry Ombudsman found that in 2019-20 more than one-third of complaints lodged with the ombudsman were related to issues around internet service (42,883 complaints making up 33.7 per cent of all complaints about telcos).

More than 19,000 were specifically NBN issues.

Mr Makki’s main frustration is that, rather than retailers and the NBN Co working together to help consumers, they are leaving these issues for consumers to sort out themselves.

“I shouldn’t have to pursue this myself,” Mr Makki said.

“I shouldn’t have to pursue with TPG, I shouldn’t have to pursue with NBN. That’s their responsibility to make sure that if I pay for something, I get what I pay for.

“If they don’t [provide the speeds promised] they should face the consequences, they should pay the penalty.”

‘Disregard for consumers, disregard for the law’

Hefty penalties could be on the cards if Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) boss Rod Sims gets his way.

Rod Sims standing in a park in Vaucluse during NSW lockdown.
ACCC chairman Rod Sims is seeking court penalties against the three telcos. (Adam Wyatt)

The consumer watchdog alleges the three telcos had promised some customers they would test line speeds and offer remedies such as cheaper plans with refunds, but had failed to do so.

Mr Sims said the companies would be taken to court for making alleged false or misleading representations in their promotion of some 50Mbps and 100Mbps NBN plans, in breach of the law.

“The misleading element was that they told consumers they would do something — that is, check the line and offer them a remedy if it couldn’t provide the service they were paying for — and they did not do that.”

Mr Sims said he understood the telcos were getting a service off NBN, but argued “they are the ones providing the service to the consumers”.

“They are the ones making promises to consumers that they didn’t keep. I should also add that we were onto this activity in 2017,” he said.

“Rather than take litigation action [at the time], then they gave us an undertaking that they would do all these things.

“They freely gave that undertaking, and then not to do it, I think shows a disregard for their consumers, and frankly, a disregard for the law.”Australia’s internet options compared

The ACCC also alleged Telstra, Optus and TPG wrongly accepted payments from certain customers for NBN plans when they were not provided with the promised speeds.

The telcos have started offering remedies to affected customers, including compensation or a chance to change to a new plan or provider.

Mr Sims said he’s pleased the telcos are providing their customers remedies, but remained firm that it’s also time to send the telcos a message.

“We need penalties [imposed], so that they [the three telcos] don’t do this again, and as a message to others,” he says.

“This is a very concentrated industry. These are the three main players by far in that industry and I think that probably means that they are fairly comfortable and not trying to please their customers as much as you would in a more competitive market.

“The message we want to send is, ‘do what you say you’re going to do. Look after your customers and adhere and take seriously the Australian Consumer Law.'”

Telcos want to work more closely with NBN Co on speeds

The three telcos have apologised to their customers, but have argued that the issue of speeds was complex and NBN Co had left it entirely to retailers to sort out.

Telstra chief executive Andy Penn told The Business earlier this month that his company did not deliberately try to mislead customers.

Andy Penn defends Telstra saying his company 'do more than anybody to keep regional Australia connected'
Telstra chief executive Andy Penn says the retailer did not deliberately try to mislead customers.(News Video)

“There’s more of a problem in the process in the industry rather than anybody I think deliberately seeking to mislead customers,” Mr Penn said.

“The practical reality is that when an RSP (retail service provider), such as Telstra or one of our competitors, sells an NBN service to a customer, we are not able to know what the speed is. We then have to connect the customer and then at that point … we’re able to determine the speed that’s available.

“And if it’s less than what the customer was advertised in the speed plan, we then go back to that customer and give an opportunity for the customer to change their mind or give them a credit.

“There’s a lot of to-ing and fro-ing and we don’t always get it right. And it’s not deliberate.

“But if we could fix up that process so we knew what the speed was in the first place — we would need to be able to work closely with the NBN to be able do that – then it will eliminate this issue within the industry.”

An Optus spokeswoman said speed achievable on some NBN connections could be impacted by “issues including the length and quality of the copper line that connects a customer to the NBN” and that “unfortunately, not all NBN connections can deliver the same speeds.”

A TPG spokeswoman said there was “no intention whatsoever by TPG Internet to avoid its obligations”.

“The decision to make telcos responsible for the failings of the NBN was flawed from the start,” she said.

“The fact that Telstra, Optus and TPG Internet have all experienced the same issue points squarely at the fundamental problems with the NBN.

“That is why we have decided to focus on offering 4G and 5G fixed wireless services using our own mobile network as an alternative to NBN services.”

Call to stop the ‘finger-pointing’

Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN) spokeswoman Melyssa Troy said the finger pointing between retailers and NBN Co needed to stop.

“Consumers are just frustrated about not getting a product that they’re paying for,” she said.

Melyssa Troy on her laptop at the park looking at a report her organisation did on consumer complaints.
Australian Communications Consumer Action Network (ACCAN) spokeswoman Melyssa Troy says better consumer protections are needed. (Adam Wyatt.)

“We need better protections when it comes to fault repairs and timeframes, and when it comes to getting consumers connected to the NBN in the first place, and making sure that consumers can get the speeds that they’ve paid for.”

She said when the refunds are issued by NBN, they currently go to the retailer to pass on to the consumer.

“But there’s no obligation for the telcos to pass that on to you the consumer,” she said.

“If you have an NBN technician who doesn’t show up for an appointment, the telco gets the refund, but there’s no guarantee that they have to pass that through to you [the customer].

“If we have good consumer protections in place, then we can get to a place where broadband products are affordable and reliable for consumers.”

More consumers take up faster NBN plans

About 400,000 residential broadband customers moved to higher speed plans in the June 2021 quarter as the recent trend of Australian consumers upgrading to faster NBN connections continued, the ACCC’s latest NBN Wholesale Market Indicators Report reveals.

The report, released today, looks at the wholesale market for NBN services in which retail service providers purchase access to the NBN so they can supply broadband internet to consumers and businesses.

Consumers and businesses increased their take-up of higher speed services of 50Mbps or above in the June quarter. Almost three-quarters of all NBN wholesale connections are now at speeds of 50Mbps or above, including 17.3 per cent of all services at speeds of 100Mbps or above.

“Most broadband customers are now using higher speed tiers and that is a result of more retail providers and NBN promoting higher speed plans,” ACCC Commissioner Anna Brakey said.

“NBN Co’s incentives for retail providers, such as its ‘Focus on Fast’ promotion, have been welcome as many Australians work and study from home.”

“Retailers may revert to standard pricing for premium services once a promotion ends, and we urge customers to monitor their usage to make sure that their service meets their ongoing needs,” Ms Brakey said.

Retail service providers acquired significantly more bandwidth over the June quarter, up 9.2 per cent, which resulted in total Connectivity Virtual Circuit (CVC) acquired per customer increasing from 2.54Mbps to 2.74Mbps. The amount of bandwidth acquired is one of the key factors that impact customer experience.

“We are pleased that retail providers are acquiring additional capacity to support network demand and keep consumers connected,” Ms Brakey said.

“The ACCC will continue to monitor CVC to see what effect the end of the ‘Focus on Fast’ promotion has on it.”

Wholesale market shares for the four main retail service providers remained fairly stable in the June quarter. Of the smaller retail providers, Aussie Broadband continued to make strong gains and accounted for 26 per cent of the wholesale services added in the quarter, lifting its market share to 4.7 per cent.

Further information, including time series data, is available on the ACCC website at NBN Wholesale Market Indicators


The ACCC’s Wholesale Market Indicators Report contains information on NBN’s provision of services to retail service providers. It does not report on the services supplied by retail service providers to end users.

Retail service providers use the NBN’s wholesale access service to supply retail services to their own customers or, alternatively, to supply a wholesale service to another (usually smaller) retail service provider.

Most small retail service providers do not directly connect with NBN Co, instead reselling services that they buy from larger providers (such as Telstra, TPG and Optus).

Change in speed tiers December 2017 to June 2021*TC4 AVCs12Mbps25Mbps50Mbps≥100MbpsDecember 20171,022,4941,884,662158,959400,848Low/high speed83.8%16.2%June 2021968,6441,165,1704,585,8631,451,104Low/high speed26.1%73.9%

*NBN ‘Wireless Plus’ services (2.4%) are excluded from the table, as they cannot be categorised by speed tier.

ACCC Infocentre: 

Use this form to make a general enquiry.

#AceNewsDesk report ……..

Editor says …Sterling Publishing & Media Service Agency is not responsible for the content of external site or from any reports, posts or links, and can also be found here on Telegram: all of our posts fromTwitter can be found here: and all wordpress and live posts and links here: thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet and free help and guidance tips on your PC software or need help & guidance from our experts AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com

Ace Daily News

(AUSTRALIA) Federal Court Report: ACCC Institutes proceedings against each of (Telstra), (Optus), and TPG for making alleged false or misleading representations in their promotions of some 50Mbps and 100Mbps NBN plans, in breach of Consumer Law #AceNewsDesk report

#AceNewsReport – Aug.10: The ACCC has instituted separate proceedings in the Federal Court against each of Telstra Corporation Ltd (Telstra), Optus Internet Pty Limited (Optus), and TPG Internet Pty Ltd (TPG) for making alleged false or misleading representations in their promotions of some 50Mbps and 100Mbps NBN plans, in breach of the Australian Consumer Law.

#AceDailyNews reports the the ACCC institutes federal court proceedings against Telstra, Optus & TPG who allegedly misled consumers over NBN maximum speeds…..


The ACCC alleges that the companies made representations to some consumers on Fibre to the Node (FTTN) connections that they would test the maximum speed of their connections, notify the impacted consumer of their maximum speed if their line was underperforming, and offer them remedies if the maximum speed was below their plan’s stated speed, but failed to do so for many customers.

It is also alleged Telstra, Optus and TPG wrongly accepted payments from certain customers for NBN plans when they were not provided with the promised speeds.

“Telstra, Optus and TPG each promised to tell consumers within a specific or reasonable timeframe if the speed they were paying for could not be reached on their connection. They also promised to offer them a cheaper plan with a refund if that was the case. Instead, we allege, they failed to do these things, and as a result many consumers paid more for their NBN plans than they needed to,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said.

“Collectively, hundreds of thousands of consumers were allegedly misled by these three big internet providers, Telstra, Optus and TPG, which accepted payments for NBN speeds they could not provide.”

“What makes this behaviour even more concerning is that Telstra, Optus and TPG were well aware of these issues and had earlier given undertakings to the ACCC to provide remedies to consumers who purchased NBN plans with speeds that couldn’t be delivered,” Mr Sims said.

“We are very disappointed that these companies do not seem to have taken seriously the undertakings they gave to the ACCC.”

The allegedly false and misleading statements were made on the companies’ websites and in emails to consumers from at least 1 April 2019 to 30 April 2020 by Telstra and TPG, and at least 1 January 2019 and 31 December 2019 by Optus.

Telstra stated it would test the line speed 21 days after connection and promised consumers “If your nbn connection doesn’t allow you to properly benefit from the speed tier you’re on, we’ll provide you with a maximum line speed, once it’s available, along with alternative options”.

Optus also told consumers it would check the speeds and that “options will be provided if the actual speed you achieve is lower than what’s included in your plan or speed pack”, while TPG said it would email consumers their line speeds “around three weeks after activation” and that consumers would “have the option to move to a lower speed plan (if available) or to change providers without contract break fees”.

The ACCC alleges that Telstra, Optus and TPG didn’t have adequate systems in place to implement the speed checks, notifications and remedies they said they would carry out.

This investigation was prompted both by Telstra self-reporting elements of this conduct to the ACCC and by information in the ACCC’s Measuring Broadband Australia Reports indicating consumers were not receiving the speeds they were paying for.

“Internet speed is one of the main features consumers look for when choosing their NBN plan, but it can be complex, confusing and time-consuming for them to understand the features of advertised NBN services and they cannot check their maximum speed themselves,” Mr Sims said.

“It is important that internet providers like Telstra, Optus and TPG give their customers accurate information so they can make an informed choice about the service that best suits their needs and budget.”

“We are pleased that Telstra, Optus and TPG have promised to compensate consumers even before the court case is finalised,” Mr Sims said.

Telstra, Optus or TPG are contacting current and former customers who are affected to advise them if they are eligible for a refund, and offer alterative plans, or an opportunity to leave their contract without penalty, if appropriate. Consumers may also contact their provider directly for further information.

The ACCC is seeking a range of orders, including declarations, injunctions, pecuniary penalties, publication orders and the implementation of compliance programs.


In August 2017, the ACCC published guidance for retailers about how to advertise NBN broadband services and the applicable speeds.

In late 2017, TelstraOptus and TPG provided court-enforceable undertakings to the ACCC to provide remedies to consumers after they had promoted NBN plans with specific maximum speeds which could not be obtained. The undertakings also required them to check the maximum speeds and inform consumers if this did not meet the speed in their plan.

Between 2018 and 2020, the ACCC’s Measuring Broadband Australia Reports indicated some consumers were continuing to pay for internet plans with higher speeds than they were receiving.

The ACCC has previously taken legal action against Telstra, and Optus (in 2018early 2019, and late 2019) in relation to other false and misleading statements.

Telstra, TPG Telecom Ltd (TPG’s parent company) and SingTel Optus (Optus’ parent company) are the three largest internet service providers in Australia.  


Telstra website (red box inserted for emphasis)

Telstra website (red box inserted for emphasis)

Optus terms and conditions on its website (red box inserted for emphasis)

Optus terms and conditions on its website (red box inserted for emphasis)

TPG website (red box inserted for emphasis)

TPG website (red box inserted for emphasis)

ACCC Infocentre: 

Use this form to make a general enquiry.

#AceNewsDesk report ……Published: Aug.09: 2021:

Editor says …Sterling Publishing & Media Service Agency is not responsible for the content of external site or from any reports, posts or links, and can also be found here on Telegram: all of our posts fromTwitter can be found here: and all wordpress and live posts and links here: thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet and free help and guidance tips on your PC software or need help & guidance from our experts AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com

Ace Daily News

(AUSTRALIA) Telstra Report: Future generations may never know the thrill of making a reverse-charges call to their parents after Telstra made its 15,000 payphones free #AceNewsDesk report

#AceNewsReport – Aug.05: The telco announced today local or national calls to a fixed line or Australian mobile from a Telstra payphone would no longer incur a charge: The move means the days of scrambling for 50 cents in change, or devising a code involving a predetermined number of rings were effectively over…..

#AceDailyNews says that local, national and calls to mobiles will now be free from Telstra payphones and the company said around 11 million calls were made from its payphones last year, including 230,000 calls to critical services such as 000 and Lifeline.

Play Audio. Duration: 9 minutes 21 seconds

Telstra CEO Andy Penn said the move to make every payphone free would cost the company around $5 million a year:

“Just watching over the last 18 months how they’ve played a role in emergency situations through the bushfires in keeping people connected and particularly those that are vulnerable and disadvantaged, I just thought we’ve got to a point where we can make this free,” he said

“It’s not not a big deal for Telstra.” 

“It just means people don’t have to worry about having a pocketful of coins if they need to make a phone call in an emergency.”

Mr Penn said Telstra had no plans to remove any of the payphones, and the number of phones the company maintained was determined by the federal government.

The phones have previously been made free to communities affected by natural disasters, or in remote indigenous communities.

Telstra has also offered free Christmas and New Year calls from its payphones for the past five years.

Salvation Army Major Brendan Nottle said it was a “game changer” for people who couldn’t afford a mobile phone, or have had to leave dangerous domestic situations.

“Many vulnerable Australians don’t have access to a mobile phone so it’s really important for them to break down that sense of social poverty, social isolation to connect with a friend, or to connect with a service,” he said.

“During COVID we’ve seen the spotlight shone on isolation and the reality is there is a proportion of Australians that suffer from social isolation every day of their lives.”

#AceNewsDesk report ………Published: Aug.05: 2021:

Editor says …Sterling Publishing & Media Service Agency is not responsible for the content of external site or from any reports, posts or links, and can also be found here on Telegram: all of our posts fromTwitter can be found here: and all wordpress and live posts and links here: thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet and free help and guidance tips on your PC software or need help & guidance from our experts AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com

Ace Daily News

(AUSTRALIA) Federal Court Report: Orders that Telstra pay $50 million in penalties for engaging in unconscionable conduct when it sold mobile contracts to more than 100 Indigenous consumers across three states and territories, in proceedings brought by the ACCC. #AceNewsDesk report

#AceNewsReport – May.14: Sales staff in these Telstra-branded stores used unconscionable practices to sell products to dozens of Indigenous customers who, in many cases, spoke English as a second or third language,” ACCC Chair Rod Sims said:

ACCC REPORT: ‘Telstra to pay $50m penalty for unconscionable sales to Indigenous consumers: They admitted that between January 2016 and August 2018, it breached the Australian Consumer Law and acted unconscionably when sales staff at five licensed Telstra-branded stores signed up 108 Indigenous consumers to multiple post-paid mobile contracts which they did not understand and could not afford’


“This conduct included manipulating credit assessments and misrepresenting products as free, and exploiting the social, language, literacy and cultural vulnerabilities of these Indigenous customers.”

“Telstra’s board and senior executives failed to act quickly enough to stop these illegal practices when they were later alerted to them,” Mr Sims said.

“The $50 million penalty imposed against Telstra is the second highest penalty ever imposed under the Australian Consumer Law. This is appropriate given the nature of the behaviour by Australia’s biggest telecommunications company, which was truly beyond conscience,” Mr Sims said.

In some cases, sales staff at the licensed stores failed to properly explain the potential costs of the contract to the consumers and falsely represented that consumers were receiving products for ‘free’.

In many instances, sales staff also manipulated credit assessments, so consumers who otherwise may have failed its credit assessment process could purchase post-paid mobile products. This included falsely indicating that a consumer was employed when they were not.

Telstra has since taken steps to waive the debts, refund money paid and put in place measures to reduce the risk of similar conduct in the future.

In addition to the remedies ordered by the Federal Court, the ACCC has accepted a court-enforceable undertaking from Telstra in which Telstra undertakes to provide remediation to affected consumers, improve its existing compliance program, review and expand its Indigenous telephone hotline, and enhance its digital literacy program for consumers in certain remote areas.

“We expect much better behaviour from large businesses like Telstra,  but all businesses in Australia have a responsibility to ensure sales staff are not breaching consumer law by manipulating or tricking consumers into buying products or services they do not need or cannot afford,” Mr Sims said.

Telstra admitted liability, cooperated with the ACCC’s investigation and made joint submissions with the ACCC to the Court in relation to penalty and other orders. 


On 26 November 2020, the ACCC instituted Federal Court proceedings against Telstra for admitted unconscionable conduct in the sale of post-paid mobile products to Indigenous consumers. 

Telstra is Australia’s largest retail supplier of mobile telephones and telephony and data services for mobile telephones and tablets, which offers pre-paid and post-paid services to its customers. It is a publicly listed company, incorporated in Australia.

Telstra operates stores across Australia, including stores operated by independent licensees which sell Telstra products and services on behalf of Telstra through Telstra-branded stores.

The admitted unconscionable conduct occurred at licensed stores in Alice Springs, Casuarina and Palmerston (NT), Arndale (SA), and Broome (WA).

Consumers from remote Indigenous Australian communities located near these stores were affected by the alleged conduct, including the regions surrounding Darwin, the islands off Northern Territory, the Kimberley region and the Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara Lands (APY Lands) in central Australia.

ACCC Infocentre: 

Use this form to make a general enquiry.

#AceNewsDesk report ……..Published: May.14: 2021:

Editor says #AceNewsDesk reports by and all our posts, also links can be found at here for Twitter and Live Feeds and thanks for following as always appreciate every like, reblog or retweet and free help and guidance tips on your PC software or need help & guidance from our experts AcePCHelp.WordPress.Com